An exploratory and iterative approach to gen AI use as a tutor

Itziar San Sebastian Sauto | ASSH
Itziar San Sebastian Sauto, tutor in Spanish, in the School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, speaks to how generative Artificial Intelligence (gen AI) is transforming both her classroom and the ways that she teaches.
In the video below, Itziar speaks to where the exploration of gen AI has led so far.
Itziar: My name is Itziar San Sebastian Sauto, and I'm a tutor here at the University of Wollongong. I teach Spanish. I've been using gen AI in my teaching in different ways. One of them is just to save some time to me to create differentiating approaches in the classroom. We really have a quite diverse background of students in Spanish.
One of the samples to acknowledge that differentiation in the classroom is, for example, with the Generative AI can very easily access to a list of vocabulary, for example, with cognates that they are words that sound similar in both languages. In this case could be English and Punjabi or English in Korean, English in Italian. Some of them are obvious, some of them are quite difficult and there are none of them. But again, I can show the students that I am already acknowledging his background.
For example, when someone I see that is struggling to, for example, with the comprehension reading of any text. I don't have the time to just go and paraphrase all the text for being accessible for him or for her or for them. I just ask them to paraphrase the full text in a lower level. Lower in the sense that it's still natural and it's something that is not, that it still makes sense inside the course. But it's a little bit lower. So we just scaffold that student into getting to whatever we are aiming for him or for them to do at the end of the course.
What inspires me the most to use gen AI is just the students. I feel that we really trust that we are here for them, and the student should be the center of our teaching. I cannot reach to every single one of them. I don't have something else to help me, and plus, the day has 24 hours and I have a life as well. So I find sometimes that is the mainstream of teaching let's always some other students out, and I was just trying to get them back in.
How?
Itziar explored a range of gen AI tools to determine which would work best for her context, through a process of trial and error and experimentation with different features for different use cases within her teaching.
Itziar: "The generative AI tools I have been using so far include ChatGPT, Twee, Diffit, Perplexity, Roshi.ai, Unriddle, Quiz Ekko, and ai.invideo.io. Their integration has helped me, from streamlining workloads to co-designing with AI, and has become indispensable in creating a dynamic and more inclusive learning environment. I used them to considerably revise and extend course content to promote inclusivity and to address broader student interests, backgrounds, and language skill levels. ChatGPT, particularly, stands out for its remarkable ability to generate syllabus aligned activities, ranging from worksheets and vocabulary lists to quizzes, tailored to different Depths of Knowledge (DOK) levels to facilitate the adaptation of past course activities."
In the video below, Itziar speaks to her mindset for determining how gen AI tools could inform her teaching practice and the implications of these choices for her students.
Itziar: I think that deciding what is the best tool of gen AI to use for my content is the biggest challenge. Because there are so many options out there. We are like experts in our content and all of a sudden we are getting somewhere else that we really don't find ourselves being experts. So I think it's a little bit scary. What I did is just first is just look online. It's just look for the most common tools being used for foreign language teaching and go with it.
A lot of things that I wanted to do in my class is to bring real things, not to create documents for the students to learn the language. Bring things that they are right now at their age group. Things that they are appealing to them. I'm not going to put them Pocoyo or any kind of I don't know Sesame Street. They are 18, 19, 20, 24 years old students. So we need to bring them something that is really they talk to them. So I think in this case is that again I don't think that is about generative artificial intelligence. It's again about being a teacher. Also because of the specific of our subject is foreign language teaching. It's very specific. I'm not saying that the rest of the subject I'm not saying it's specific like we are different and special, but it's different because it's not only the content we are teaching them to how to communicate.
So out of the communication and human communication using generative AI and how to bring that thing together. So I think that in the process of choosing the tools, in the process of why this one and not the other one, I still need to have some feedback from my students and that's what I what I'm trying to do is get the feedback from students and try to see if this is working or not. Give us a little bit of a let's make some decisions around what happened last semester and now let's bring them together. And I think that we will be really true to ourselves saying can we have them as a that we are working together. It's a collaborative tool. We can do it together. It's not that I give you this, I teach you how to use it and then you use it. I think that's too much. It's like we are putting ourselves in a hierarchy that we are here the students are there and it shouldn't. If they are there with us we are learning teaching and doing the whole process together and I think that that's what we will be aiming for.
Itziar: "Equipping students to navigate the evolving landscape of AI-driven advancements demands a proactive approach to ethical considerations. Instead of viewing these tools as potential avenues for cheating, teachers and students alike must educate themselves about AI and employ it judiciously. At the beginning of the course, we established clear limitations for using generative tools like ChatGPT."
"I found that providing students with clear and consistent messaging on the ethical and critical use of Generative AI in assessment tasks was crucial. Emphasising transparency helped negotiate guidance with students, connecting the use of AI to course learning outcomes. "
"This clarity aids students in understanding how gen AI supports their learning and sets expectations for its use. I fostered this responsible use and ethical considerations by designing controlled activities involving ChatGPT, in which students are prompted to evaluate AI responses critically, instilling an awareness of the limitations inherent in gen AI. Stressing the acceptable uses of AI for concept explanations, idea organisation, editing, and research while maintaining a critical final check for integrity ensured a balanced and constructive integration of gen AIin assessments. Here are a couple of example activities that combine Spanish language learning, critical thinking, and ethical considerations with the help of AI-powered ChatGPT."
"One of the activities is called 'Story Generation,' which focuses on developing creative thinking skills in Spanish. Students provide a story prompt to ChatGPT and then analyse the resulting story, discussing cultural nuances and ethical considerations. The key objective is to emphasise the importance of context and responsible use of AI in creative endeavours. In the "Generated Article Critique" activity, students critically analyse an article generated by ChatGPT on a relevant topic. They examine potential biases, misinformation, and ethical concerns. This activity fosters analytical thinking and ethical evaluation skills. After each activity, it is essential to facilitate discussions encouraging students to reflect on the ethical implications and critical thinking aspects of their interactions with AI-powered tools like ChatGPT."
Itziar's methods reflect application of the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) guidelines (CAST, 2024) that emphasise the importance of relevant and authentic strategies for “connecting prior knowledge to new learning” (consideration 3.1) and “building fluencies with graduated support for practice and performance” (consideration 5.3).
Reflection & Impact
In the video below, Itziar speaks to the learnings discovered through an iterative approach taken with her gen AI journey so far.
Itziar: I was very lucky to have a coordinator that was willing to accept my ideas, and I really feel very fortunate about it. Her name is Dr. Catherine Seaton, and she is the coordinator for Spanish 242. The main challenge with the course content was that I found it very challenging to engage the students because they were coming from different backgrounds. So I suggested to Catherine that maybe we could adjust the subject outline slightly, and she was willing to try it.
The feedback that we received from the students was really the best that we could get. That feedback was like a sign that I was about to give up, and now I think that I can do it. I believe that at some point it's not just about them making it no matter what. The reason might be that they need extra help. So, we shouldn't be scared of changing things because we are not just changing; we are making it better and providing more options.
We were teaching them how to communicate because communication is language. If you know this, you will be able to create a class where everyone is engaged and feels included. We couldn't have done it if we didn't take those tools because it would have taken us forever to create their content. We were also very aware that we were saving time, not just to go for our coffees, but totally the opposite—to keep going and see what we could do.
We are willing to repeat what we did in Spanish 242 again in the spring semester and use what we learned from it. We want to use it again if it works, and mostly to have the students' feedback as a way to confirm that it is indeed working. This is significant, and the students really appreciate when they see that you are just a bit aware—that you see them and even if you are saying "I see you, I cannot help you right now," but still, you see them.
So it's not just that you are there. I think that's wrong. The generative AI tool can help me do that because it saves me some time to do that little research and instead bring something that I can offer. One of the challenges of using generative AI is that it's never completely reliable; the things that you are getting may not be reliable. And the way that we can maybe check the text that we were giving them, I will give it to the tool that is attached to it. We know the text that is producing is at a lower level of a language that we are experts or have expertise in. It's very easy for us to control the product that the generative AI is giving us. I am kind of cautious, and the things that I ask, if I'm going to bring something to the classroom, I will trust that my expertise in the language is enough to say okay because I will never ask things that are beyond my expertise.
Itziar: "This last semester, I have been focusing, in particular, on creating simplified versions of complex texts, making resources on current topics and issues more accessible to beginner-level students who may struggle with the original content. On the other hand, I was able to foster a deeper connection between Spanish, in this specific case, and the diverse student body's cultural and linguistic background by providing a list of cognates, linguistic typologies, or cultural practices and traditions that may result relevant on the grammar or topics covered by the subject outline. Most learners' feedback testimonials lean positively toward co-relating experiences and personalised interactions developed around customised learning experiences. They appreciated the course's evolution from the structured syllabus to a more crafted and adapted version, which would have been, time wise, impossible without AI tools. Students also seem to share a consensus mindset about not banning gen AI tools."
Advice for colleagues
Itziar: If I need, if I will be willing to give advice, first of all, I'm not that expert. So at first I am the first, I am the example that you can use it. If I can use it, everyone can use it because I don't know anything about it.
So I think that is just go for it. At the same time, don't go for it. I think that is the fun part, that is not scary. You use it if you want to, you then use it if you don't want to. But it's not like we will not, or it's banned from your tutorial. Just give it a try and if you don't feel comfortable, just check with your peers. So just and again, use it and if you realise that you are not getting the results that you were hoping for, don't keep using it.
There are certain things that we, oh, at the end of a tutorial or at the end of a lecture, you say like, oh my goodness, this one will be better if... But I don't have the time because I go back to my own research, I go back to my own life. Maybe you have the time to say, I'm going to trust first step on getting some ideas from a generative AI and then you will see if you don't do it or not. It's just having, I think that it gives us more options. I think that to have options is always good.
I think the communication of the use of gen AI with the students, again, is the challenging part because from one side, it's kind of like we feel a little ashamed that we are using it. We really need to communicate why we are doing it. So, we said, OK, this is the reason why you are able to read this text because we run a tool that is generative AI.
So I think that at some point, if we are true to ourselves, the artificial intelligence, the generative artificial intelligence is just letting us know that we create very intelligent questions and we know and we are willing to try. It will give us very intelligent answers that we can filter ourselves. But if it's that so good, we should be using it. We should be teaching them how to use it. It's just a tool. If you want to use it, you feel comfortable.
It's a great. If you don't use it, that doesn't mean that your class is going to be awful. Your class could be still the best. And I think that we shouldn't be scared that they're going to take our role. That's impossible. And if they are taking our role, it's because we are not doing our job. I think that that's the scary part. When the generative AI makes us change their assessment. Why? Because the assessments maybe they are not the right assessments. I think that that's the scary part. But I will be really encouraged just to give it a try and use it.
Itziar: "I encourage my colleagues to take small steps towards AI digital literacy and embrace a positive attitude towards AI, recognising its limitations while appreciating its incredible potential. Ensuring integration into teaching practices is part of a broader shift toward new learning models in our digital age, demanding educators acknowledge these transformations, actively promote them, and impart ethical values. The emphasis is on learning about AI and its practical use rather than opting for a restrictive approach."
Feedback
"I feel it necessary to adapt materials to students’ differing skill levels and feel tutors should be able to use whichever materials they wish to use, such as AI, to do so. When studying Spanish, especially in my final semester, I noticed many students were at varying levels, myself included as being someone who was slower at learning the language and therefore needed more materials than some other students. Having those extra materials provided for me and my level as opposed to everything being at the one level was extremely helpful in my ability to learn and succeed in the subject. I believe having the different materials available for all skill levels allows students to stay engaged, as the faster learners will not get bored, and the slower learners can learn at their own pace."
- Gorgia, SPAN242 student
"I think it's super important for teachers to make their material look good. As a visual learner, I stay engaged when the content grabs my attention. Using AI tools to create interesting visuals is way better than plain images. If the material isn't visually appealing, I lose focus. Visually appealing content really helps, especially for learning a new language."
- SPAN151 student"We believe the same tools should be available for both students and teachers alike. Learning a language is hard work and very time consuming if you want to do well. It would be helpful for students to have extra resources available to save time and access additional content and learning materials. I believe allowing students to also access these tools should be something to consider for future course design and could be done through such means as personalised learning activities or natural language processing, where these tools provide students with additional resources tailored to their skill level and can help with improving things like grammar and pronunciation."
- SPAN241 student
References
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6